ANALISIS KECELAKAAN PENERBANGAN DI INDONESIA UNTUK PENINGKATAN KESELAMATAN PENERBANGAN

Eko Poerwanto, Uyuunul Mauidzoh

Abstract


Achievement level of aviation safety can be achieved with the proper function of all components of the system in the aviation industry which consists of airport operators, airline operators, air traffic operators and aircraft maintenance operator, as well as the regulations set by the regulator. Every incident should be investigated aviation accidents to fin d the cause. This is to provide appropriate recommendations so that the same airline accident does not happen again. The increasing number of flights that are needed with safety guarantees. So it is importance to analyzed routine flight accident to improve the safety performance of airlines. This research is descriptive analysis with qualitative methods. Flight accidents data that have investigated from NTSC and DGCA grouped causes are then recommendations have been made by the NTSC also grouped for each operator stakeholders. Improved system of aviation safety in Indonesia can be done with a thorough analysis based on the results of investigation of NTSC whose recommendations have been given to all stakeholders in the aviation industry. The results showed that the causes of flight accidents in Indonesia is dominated by the human factor the percentage reached 60%. The highest number of the recommendations given by the NTSC to DGCA as many as 208 recommendations during the period 2007-2014 but the trend o f declining. On other side of the trend of the recommendations given to aviation operators showed an increase. This shows an increase in the duty on DGCA to always supervise, and set the standard flight operations carried out by several airline operators in Indonesia.

Keywords

Safety Aviation, Accident, Safety Level

References

Amalberti, R. (2001) The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Safety Science. 37. pp 109-126.

Boeing (2011), “Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents Worldwide Operation 1959-2010”, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle.

Cheng, W., Washington, S.P., (2005), “Experimental evaluation of hotspot identification methods'’, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37. pp 870- 881.

Christian, E., (2010)., Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan Jasa Penerbangan Di Indonesia Dengan Metode Performance Prism., Tesis Program Studi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Juni 2010.

Elvik, R. (2008), “The predictive validity of empirical Bayes estimates of road safety”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40. pp 1964-1969.

Fikarno, D.A., (2009)., Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Keselamatan Penerbangan Di Indonesia., Tesis Magister Perencanaan dan Kebijakan Publik, Program Pascasarjana, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2009.

Khairandy, Ridwan, 2006. ”Tanggung Jawab Pengangkut dan Asuransi Tanggung Jawab Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Konsumen Angkutan Udara, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 25, No.1, Jakarta, Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Bisnis, Hal. 21.

Khairumusa, A.R., (2012), Analisa Tingkat Kerawanan Bandar Udara Berdasarkan Kejadian Kecelakaan dan Insiden Serius di Indonesia, Tesis Program Studi Teknik Sipil Kekhususan Transportasi, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Juli 2012

Kementerian Perhubungan (2012), “UU No.1 Tahun 2009 Tentang Penerbangan”.

ICAO (2009), Safety Management Manual (SMM), Doc 9859, AN 474, Second edition, International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal.

ICAO (2010), “Annex 13 Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation”, Tenth Edition, International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal.

International Society of Air Safety Investigators (ISASI), Positions On Air safety Investigation Issues, Third Edition, 24 Agustus 2003.

Netjasov, F., & Janic, M. (2008). A Review of Research on Risk and Safety Modelling in Civil Aviation. Journal o f Air Transport Management, 14, 213-220

Reason, J. (1997), “Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents” Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, England.

Reason, J., (1998). Achieving A Safe Culture : Theory And Practice, Work & Stress Vol. 12, NO. 3 293-306, UK : Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, 1998.

Sentot S., (2012), Analisis Resiko Kecelakaan pada Kegiatan Pelayanan Sisi Udara Pesawat Udara di Bandara Soekarno-Hatta, Tesis Peminatan Keselamatan Kesehatan Kerja,Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Indonesia.

Silvia, M., (2014)., Pengaruh Service Quality Terhadap Customer Satisfaction dan Behavioral Intention pada Industri Penerbangan Low Cost Carriers Rute Domestik di Surabaya, : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya Vol.3 No.2 (2014)

Wardani. E.K., (2006)., Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Jasa Penerbangan (Studi Kasus pada Jasa Penerbangan Garuda Indonesia Semarang-Jakarta)., Jurnal Studi Manajemen & Organisasi, Volume 3, Nomor 1, Januari, Tahun 2006, Halaman 40

Wiradipradja., S (2006), Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan penerbangan Terhadap Penumpang Menurut hukum udara Indonesia, Jurnal hukum Bisnis, Volume 25, No.1, tahun 2006., hal.5

Wastuadhi, A.P., (2012)., Penyelenggaraan Penyelidikan Dalam Mencari Penyebab Kecelakaan Pesawat Udara Sipil Yang Terjadi Di Wilayah Indonesia, Tesis Fakultas Hukum, Program Pascasarjana, Kekhususan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Universitas

Indonesia, Jakarta, Juli 2012.

____________ . Guidelines for Investigator Training and Education, First Edition, Agustus 1999.

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) dan Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST), Aviation Occrrence Categories, Definitions and Usage Notes, May 2011.

__________ . Human error: models and management, Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, British Medical Journal, BMJ.18 March 2000; 320(7237): 768-770.

Article Metrics

Abstract view: 700 times
Download     : 489   times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.